The results to date from PHPF-002 have demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in multiple pre-specified pulmonary hemodynamic parameters, starting with the lowest dose of 30 mcg/kg IBW/hr (iNO30). Dose escalation showed:
- Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) improved by 29% (baseline PVR was 584 dynes × sec × cm-5)
- Cardiac Output (CO) improved by 16% (baseline CO was 3.5 L/min)
- Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP) improved by 10% across doses (baseline mPAP was 34.3 mmHg)
- Oxygen saturation remained stable across doses
- iNO was well-tolerated with no safety concerns across doses
“PH-ILD results in severe functional impairment and significantly reduced life expectancy. These patients suffer from constriction of the pulmonary arteries that decreases cardiac output and causes right ventricular dysfunction,” said
“We believe the acute hemodynamic benefit demonstrated in the PHPF-002 study is responsible for the chronic improvement in physical activity observed in Cohort 1 of our ongoing Phase 2/3 iNO-PF study,” said
PHPF-002 is designed to assess the acute hemodynamic benefit of escalating iNO doses in PH-ILD. The first four PHPF-002 study subjects were each treated sequentially, beginning with a dose of iNO30, followed by dose escalation to iNO45 and iNO75. Pulmonary hemodynamics were measured via right heart catheterization and collected at baseline, as well as following each sequential iNO dose. The Company intends to enroll up to four additional PH-ILD subjects in this study.
Any statements in this press release about Bellerophon’s future expectations, plans and prospects, including statements about the clinical development of its product candidates, regulatory actions with respect to the Company’s clinical trials and expectations regarding the sufficiency of the Company’s cash balance to fund clinical trials, operating expenses and capital expenditures, and other statements containing the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “contemplate,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including: the uncertainties inherent in the initiation of future clinical trials, availability and timing of data from ongoing and future clinical trials and the results of such trials, whether preliminary or interim results from a clinical trial will be predictive of the final results of that trial or whether results of early clinical trials will be indicative of the results of later clinical trials, expectations for regulatory approvals, the FDA’s substantial discretion in the approval process, availability of funding sufficient for our foreseeable and unforeseeable operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements and other factors discussed in the “Risk Factors” section of the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and in subsequent filings with the
Fabian Tenenbaum, Chief Executive Officer
|At LifeSci Advisors:
Source: Bellerophon Therapeutics, Inc.